professorkamrankhan@gmail.com 
Fury erupted last night over the ‘rushed’ and ‘fundamentally flawed’ plan to legalise assisted dying as two more MPs turned against it.
Politicians on all sides condemned the handling of the Bill as it returned to the Commons for just a few hours – with speeches cut short and nine of those who put forward proposals not even given time to speak.
The debate on dozens of suggested changes was then stopped after two votes when Bill supporters called for it to end, rather than being allowed to continue next month.
One change was approved, to ensure no one including pharmacists and social workers is forced to help people to end their lives, but an attempt to prevent staff doing so against their employers’ wishes was rejected.
The architect of the legislation, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, also faced anger for leaving the chamber during the debate, and for suddenly accepting a new safeguard to protect people with anorexia.
Naz Shah described the process as ‘fundamentally flawed’ during the debate and added later: ‘This Bill is profoundly important and this chaos does a disservice to Parliament and to our constituents. We shouldn’t be playing games with people’s lives like this.’
Former Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said afterwards: ‘Today’s debate showed that there is significant movement against the Bill amongst MPs, and that the movers are keen to close down debate and avoid scrutiny. As expert opinion grows against this dangerous Bill, you can see why.’
A person holds a placard as Kim Leadbeater, MP for Spen Valley, speaks to a woman, on the day of a demonstration in support of assisted dying outside the British parliament
People take part in a demonstration against assisted dying on May 16, 2025 in London
Labour’s Mike Reader said: ‘No matter your views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, people must agree that the time that’s been allocated to debate the proposed amendments is not adequate. I’m disappointed that there appears to be a campaign to rush this through, backed by significant and well-funded lobby groups.’
Scottish Tory MP John Lamont said: ‘It is outrageous that the debate has just been shut down in the House of Commons – we need proper time to consider these plans.’ Fellow Conservative Rebecca Smith said: ‘I didn’t get to speak to my amendment highlighting the concerns of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
‘We could have continued today’s debate on June 13 but the pro [assisted dying] side said no.’
Meanwhile, Labour’s Jonathan Hinder became the latest MP to announce on social media that he would vote against the Bill at the third reading stage next month, having supported it at the first Parliamentary stage last year.
He said: ‘We were told that the proposed safeguards were the strictest in the world, only for the approval of a High Court judge to be removed shortly after the second reading. To me, this is the most obvious indicator that this Bill has been rushed.’
And Labour MP for Crawley Peter Lamb, who previously abstained, said he would now vote against.
It means at least nine MPs who either backed the Bill or abstained last time will now vote against or abstain next month.
Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of Esther Rantzen, joins terminally ill people, affected families and campaigners for a change in the law on assisted dying gather outside the Palace of Westminster in London
With a majority of 55 at Second Reading, only 28 of those MPs need to change sides for it to be defeated. In the vote yesterday on an amendment by an opponent of the Bill, there was a majority of 36.
Speaking outside Parliament yesterday, Dame Esther Rantzen’s daughter Rebecca Wilcox said: ‘We should be able to have a pain-free, caring, compassionate death. I only wish I could get that for my mother… the peace of mind that would come with that would be huge.’
Dame Esther, who has terminal cancer, supports assisted dying and has backed the Bill.
